In the article "Individuals in Groups", by Carol Travis, it is published in the Los Angeles Times, 1991. The author states that people act differently when they are in the groups than individuals.When something danger occur , people in individuals can call a help and sometimes risk their proper life; however, in the groups they seat back. the author has showed some experiences in article that individuals group response in majority than the groups. In addition, the more people in the groups the more they are interdependent and they think everything has being taken care; additionally, I believe the author is right because people in the groups will rely to each other.
The author mentioned that"But if they are in the group observing the same danger, they hold back" I think this is true because none of them don't want to waste the times when they are there for the same purpose. They will keep looking at each other face to who can intervene. For example, when I used work in messenger center, we were six people.Anytime we received delivery, we seemed like busy, but not and we began to look at each other face. It took several minutes before someone decided to act. People in the groups are lazy  and they don't make things work fast also properly unless they have to direct them.
Warehouse I make delivery now. No one wants unload the van. When I ask someone, he sends me to the other and vis-versa. The author noticed the passage that" But the students who were sitting in the groups of the three did not move" I support the author idea because they think someone already did the job. People in the groups don't like other person in the group tell what to do. Everybody thinks big and they think better than other. These people in the groups sometimes always argue for the jobs. One can say I did many things so is other person turn. Also, people in the groups are not responsible. In order to get work done in the groups, each individual has to be responsible, sometimes that can make a work to be done.
In conclusion, the author states that people act differently when they are in the groups than in an individual. People in the groups rely on each other and they take their times to do a work. Moreover, people in the group always sit there before they act because they don't want one in the group tells other to do job. Also, someone who has done a lot and can point other person to do something too. I think people in the groups should be signed for the work because everyone will make sure that a work has to be done on time and fast. 

ENG99

1.The author says that" this weakness was on full display in the shouting match over the planned mosque( which isn't really a mosque) at Ground Zero ( which isn't really Ground Zero) in downtown Manhattan.Since September 11 date of destroying twins tower, Muslim people became discriminate with anything that associate to that religious.Muslims were accusing to bomber those towers and there was a plan that showed Muslims were building a mosque there, which was not truth.People who were doing something like this were Anti- Muslims and they wanted  to play mind to get what they want. however, this can bring a lot of problems among people who being living long ego. For example, I remember this ad building a mosque in Ground Zero when Muslims were demonstrating in downtown Manhattan and a white man came to assault a Muslim with a knife.That behavior had brought many issues in some mix different neighborhoods. I think people have to think about news their receive because every Muslims are bad for this country; also, there are many Muslims condanme what those organisations are doing around of the World.

 2.The author mentioned that " it is easy to manipulate people's belief systems with insinuating pictures or inflammatory quotes". I believe that is truth because its make mad and it can rise people up.People design well this ad and we are finishing to believe it.Such as, in few years ego, someone posted Muslims Prophet picture in social media and many none Muslims were believed it ; in consequence, many Muslims countries reacted violently.Even though some people take time to think, they know how to come up with some things that can put fire among of people. This situation is only religions ; nevertheless, this ad touches too people with different origins, skin colors and cultures.We should take a time before to react and also find source the news.

3.In conclusion, the author is talking about people are deceived by the rumors.In addition, I believe the author is right because people will believe that is truth.They will design the pictures that can touch people heart and adjust them in some evenment that can make people believe. they always know how to touch people feeling

ENG99

According to the author "I Know the Truth, Don't Bother Me with Facts" is written by Jeffrey Kluger and it is published in October 29, 2010.The author is talking about people are deceived by false rumors. Few years ego, they showed a plan of mosque that Muslims are building in ground zero, but it wasn't truth. There is a study in Ohio State of University to find how people believe in false rumors and how to free them not to believe such thing. Also, two professors from the same state conducted a study . they came up with two conclusions, the system manipulate people easily and some of them want to change their mind with contradiction of evidence they were given.Even people learn the facts, sometime their effort is not good and we don't like to be telling we were wrong.However, there is a deep study to find about functionment of different parts of brain. In addition, I think the author is right because these false rumors always bring issues among of people.

Hype



the article "Hype"  is written by Kall Lasn . the article is talking about advertisement are everywhere and ads spoil people mind. Ads are most of the things can toxic people mind. In the morning to the night, you hear and see many ads per day. also, each day about billion or million of ads are displaying and listening in North America. Anywhere you turn your eye, there are ads. Even though in country area, there are ads display; moreover, kids watch ads in classroom, too. On top of that, there is small monitor on the shopping cart to see to see about products. You don't have anywhere to hide and to run. however, too much ads are not good because ads  prevent you to concentrate and ads hunt you everywhere.

According to Kall "Everyday an estimated 12 billion display ads, 3 million radio commercials are dumped into North America's collective unconscious" I think the author is right because these ads can't make someone conscious about what you are doing. Also, ads can't stop you to think what you had in your mind previously. Such as, as soon you turn on devices, most of the times your hit right there in front of your with bunch of ads. When you are watching T.V or listening some emissions on the radio, there are a lot of ads will come up and those can make you to lose a concentration ; also, not to remember about everything you being watching or listening.

Lasn says " there is nowhere to run . No one is exempt and no one will be spared" I believe this is true because ads are hunting you everywhere. Ads follow you anywhere you go, even in the bathroom, they are there looking at you. this is include everyone and you can't run away from them or hide. they are with you from morning to the night and you wake up tomorrow will the same. For example, you go to super market for the simple things. You will be surrounding about many ads. Ads are part of people live to day modern .

In conclusion, the article is about too much ads and they spoil people mind too. I think too much ads are not good because they stop people to concentrate. People see a lot of ads everyday on the radio, T.V and display everywhere. Also, ads follow people everywhere and no matter who you are.